Global Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Size, Status and Forecast 2019-2025

Published On: Jun 2019

Format: PDF

Publisher: QY Research

Pages: 91

Report ID: 1720

Collapse of the vertebrae due to trauma, osteoporosis or other causes of weakening of the vertebrae is known as vertebral compression fracture (VCF). VCF is more common in people with low bone mass or suffering from osteoporosis. Some of the common symptoms of VCF include, back pain lasting for more than 2-3 weeks, limited spinal mobility, vertebral height loss over time and kyphosis, disability and deformity over a period of time. Vertebral compression fracture is treated primarily with pharmacological therapy and prolonged bed rest. Surgically, VCFs are treated with minimally invasive VCF repair techniquesin cases where medicinal therapies fail to cure VCF.
Minimally invasive vertebral compression repair techniques include two procedures, namely, vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty. Both vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty involve injection of medical grade cement in the fractured vertebra. Kyphoplasty is a newer and evolved form of vertebroplasty, where a balloon is inserted in the vertebral body and inflated to restore the original height of the collapsed vertebra and is thereafter followed by cement injection. Vertebroplasty successfully relives pain and enhances mobility of the patient; while on the other hand, balloon kyphoplasty not only relives the pain but also restores vertebral height and assists in curing kyphosis.
In 2018, the global Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair market size was xx million US$ and it is expected to reach xx million US$ by the end of 2025, with a CAGR of xx% during 2019-2025.

This report focuses on the global Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair status, future forecast, growth opportunity, key market and key players. The study objectives are to present the Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair development in United States, Europe and China.

The key players covered in this study
Alphatec Spine, Inc.
CareFusion Corporation
Cook Medical
DFine
DePuy Synthes
Globus Medical
Medtronic
Parallax Medical
Stryker Corporation
Zimmer Holdings Incorporated

Market segment by Type, the product can be split into
Vertebroplasty Devices
Kyphoplasty Devices

Market segment by Application, split into
Hospitals
ASCs

Market segment by Regions/Countries, this report covers
United States
Europe
China
Japan
Southeast Asia
India
Central & South America

The study objectives of this report are:
To analyze global Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair status, future forecast, growth opportunity, key market and key players.
To present the Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair development in United States, Europe and China.
To strategically profile the key players and comprehensively analyze their development plan and strategies.
To define, describe and forecast the market by product type, market and key regions.

In this study, the years considered to estimate the market size of Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair are as follows:
History Year: 2014-2018
Base Year: 2018
Estimated Year: 2019
Forecast Year 2019 to 2025
For the data information by region, company, type and application, 2018 is considered as the base year. Whenever data information was unavailable for the base year, the prior year has been considered.

Table of Contents

1 Report Overview
1.1 Study Scope
1.2 Key Market Segments
1.3 Players Covered
1.4 Market Analysis by Type
1.4.1 Global Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Size Growth Rate by Type (2014-2025)
1.4.2 Vertebroplasty Devices
1.4.3 Kyphoplasty Devices
1.5 Market by Application
1.5.1 Global Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Share by Application (2014-2025)
1.5.2 Hospitals
1.5.3 ASCs
1.6 Study Objectives
1.7 Years Considered

2 Global Growth Trends
2.1 Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Size
2.2 Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Growth Trends by Regions
2.2.1 Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Size by Regions (2014-2025)
2.2.2 Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Share by Regions (2014-2019)
2.3 Industry Trends
2.3.1 Market Top Trends
2.3.2 Market Drivers
2.3.3 Market Opportunities

3 Market Share by Key Players
3.1 Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Size by Manufacturers
3.1.1 Global Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Revenue by Manufacturers (2014-2019)
3.1.2 Global Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Revenue Market Share by Manufacturers (2014-2019)
3.1.3 Global Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Concentration Ratio (CR5 and HHI)
3.2 Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Key Players Head office and Area Served
3.3 Key Players Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Product/Solution/Service
3.4 Date of Enter into Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market
3.5 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion Plans

4 Breakdown Data by Type and Application
4.1 Global Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Size by Type (2014-2019)
4.2 Global Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Size by Application (2014-2019)

5 United States
5.1 United States Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Size (2014-2019)
5.2 Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Key Players in United States
5.3 United States Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Size by Type
5.4 United States Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Size by Application

6 Europe
6.1 Europe Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Size (2014-2019)
6.2 Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Key Players in Europe
6.3 Europe Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Size by Type
6.4 Europe Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Size by Application

7 China
7.1 China Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Size (2014-2019)
7.2 Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Key Players in China
7.3 China Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Size by Type
7.4 China Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Size by Application

8 Japan
8.1 Japan Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Size (2014-2019)
8.2 Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Key Players in Japan
8.3 Japan Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Size by Type
8.4 Japan Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Size by Application

9 Southeast Asia
9.1 Southeast Asia Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Size (2014-2019)
9.2 Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Key Players in Southeast Asia
9.3 Southeast Asia Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Size by Type
9.4 Southeast Asia Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Size by Application

10 India
10.1 India Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Size (2014-2019)
10.2 Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Key Players in India
10.3 India Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Size by Type
10.4 India Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Size by Application

11 Central & South America
11.1 Central & South America Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Size (2014-2019)
11.2 Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Key Players in Central & South America
11.3 Central & South America Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Size by Type
11.4 Central & South America Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Market Size by Application

12 International Players Profiles
12.1 Alphatec Spine, Inc.
12.1.1 Alphatec Spine, Inc. Company Details
12.1.2 Company Description and Business Overview
12.1.3 Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Introduction
12.1.4 Alphatec Spine, Inc. Revenue in Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Business (2014-2019)
12.1.5 Alphatec Spine, Inc. Recent Development
12.2 CareFusion Corporation
12.2.1 CareFusion Corporation Company Details
12.2.2 Company Description and Business Overview
12.2.3 Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Introduction
12.2.4 CareFusion Corporation Revenue in Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Business (2014-2019)
12.2.5 CareFusion Corporation Recent Development
12.3 Cook Medical
12.3.1 Cook Medical Company Details
12.3.2 Company Description and Business Overview
12.3.3 Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Introduction
12.3.4 Cook Medical Revenue in Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Business (2014-2019)
12.3.5 Cook Medical Recent Development
12.4 DFine
12.4.1 DFine Company Details
12.4.2 Company Description and Business Overview
12.4.3 Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Introduction
12.4.4 DFine Revenue in Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Business (2014-2019)
12.4.5 DFine Recent Development
12.5 DePuy Synthes
12.5.1 DePuy Synthes Company Details
12.5.2 Company Description and Business Overview
12.5.3 Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Introduction
12.5.4 DePuy Synthes Revenue in Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Business (2014-2019)
12.5.5 DePuy Synthes Recent Development
12.6 Globus Medical
12.6.1 Globus Medical Company Details
12.6.2 Company Description and Business Overview
12.6.3 Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Introduction
12.6.4 Globus Medical Revenue in Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Business (2014-2019)
12.6.5 Globus Medical Recent Development
12.7 Medtronic
12.7.1 Medtronic Company Details
12.7.2 Company Description and Business Overview
12.7.3 Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Introduction
12.7.4 Medtronic Revenue in Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Business (2014-2019)
12.7.5 Medtronic Recent Development
12.8 Parallax Medical
12.8.1 Parallax Medical Company Details
12.8.2 Company Description and Business Overview
12.8.3 Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Introduction
12.8.4 Parallax Medical Revenue in Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Business (2014-2019)
12.8.5 Parallax Medical Recent Development
12.9 Stryker Corporation
12.9.1 Stryker Corporation Company Details
12.9.2 Company Description and Business Overview
12.9.3 Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Introduction
12.9.4 Stryker Corporation Revenue in Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Business (2014-2019)
12.9.5 Stryker Corporation Recent Development
12.10 Zimmer Holdings Incorporated
12.10.1 Zimmer Holdings Incorporated Company Details
12.10.2 Company Description and Business Overview
12.10.3 Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Introduction
12.10.4 Zimmer Holdings Incorporated Revenue in Minimally Invasive Vertebral Compression Fracture Repair Business (2014-2019)
12.10.5 Zimmer Holdings Incorporated Recent Development

13 Market Forecast 2019-2025
13.1 Market Size Forecast by Regions
13.2 United States
13.3 Europe
13.4 China
13.5 Japan
13.6 Southeast Asia
13.7 India
13.8 Central & South America
13.9 Market Size Forecast by Product (2019-2025)
13.10 Market Size Forecast by Application (2019-2025)

14 Analyst's Viewpoints/Conclusions

15 Appendix
15.1 Research Methodology
15.1.1 Methodology/Research Approach
15.1.1.1 Research Programs/Design
15.1.1.2 Market Size Estimation
12.1.1.3 Market Breakdown and Data Triangulation
15.1.2 Data Source
15.1.2.1 Secondary Sources
15.1.2.2 Primary Sources
15.2 Disclaimer
15.3 Author Details